My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — real cash, no paper buying and selling — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I have zero copiers despite metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot because I genuinely want feedback, not validation.

The strategy is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that mechanically halts new purchase orders throughout sharp drops to guard capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency reasons.

90-day stay outcomes:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Fee: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days inexperienced

The thing I discover most fascinating in that fairness curve is the March–April interval. You possibly can see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might with none guide intervention. The circuit breaker did precisely what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.zero is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively strategy. Most retail algo merchants I see posting listed here are proud of zero.7–0.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a stay account with real slippage and costs.

And yet — Binance's copy trading algorithm buries me because my lead stability is ~$618. Traders with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two issues I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a method to make risk-adjusted metrics more seen to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there something that may make you personally hesitant to copy this, that I'm not seeing from the within?

Recognize trustworthy takes.